charmianland

Month

January 2011

23 posts

Brillig: Borders, Post-Mortem → brilligblogger.blogspot.com
Dec 31, 2010

December 2010

7 posts

Dec 31, 2010
kindle impressions

(partial repost from another one of my blogs)

I’ve been playing around on a Kindle 3, and loaded up various files, including text, mobi, native Amazon files, and images.

Verdict:  Solid for reading novels, and pretty good for comics and images. The web browser is only really useful if you don’t have a smartphone or similar device.

  • To be truly portable, I think the Kindle needs a case, or at least a sleeve.
  • Some don’t think e-ink is high contrast enough, but IMHO it’s fine, comparable to paperback.
  • The lower buttons are tiny and don’t really seem designed for sustained usage.
  • Web browser doesn’t default to mobile views. It really should. E-ink is also just not really optimal for viewing the web if you are clicking from page to page all the time. It’s not bad if you are just reading text.
  • Calibre works well for conversion.
  • Japanese text files display fine, but I wish the only font wasn’t sans-serif. Normally Japanese novels are in ‘regular script,’ meaning that they have the Asian equivalents of serifs. The Kindle only has the sans-serif font.
  • Succeeded at using Mangle to convert both images and scanned text.
  • Scanned text of a novel is a little small, but legible. I could trim it more to make it larger.
  • Comic was a pleasant surprise:  not as nice as a computer screen, but the Ravages of Time has very detailed art, and still, it looked pretty good, very sharp and legible, albeit small. Think of it like reading in bunko form.
  • Based on conversation w/ SubD, don’t get a small form factor (6”) ereader or device if you want to look at PDFs with charts or other graphic elements. PDFs just were destined to be read on larger screens. However, this is fairly irrelevant to my usage, although I would also benefit from a larger screen.
Dec 30, 2010
“Yahoo! actually went on the offensive and claimed they weren’t going to kill Delicious but sell it, which makes me laugh, because no such thing could be true – the most glaring reason being that Yahoo’s authentication system infests every one of their properties, and a lot of people on Delicious are using Yahoo IDs. Another is that Yahoo are incompetent assholes. Back in January of 2009, Archive Team announced that Yahoo! was not to be trusted. Someone from Yahoo! showed up and said we were wrong. I’m having this image he was fired, as was the entire staff of Delicious. Tell me how you intend to transition a site when you fire everyone first. You don’t. A place buying it would be buying the name and maybe the right to use the software. Maybe. Who would want that?” —Jason Scott (via marco) Uh oh.
Dec 29, 201070 notes
Wake Up, Geek Culture. Time to Die | Magazine → wired.com
Dec 28, 2010
Dec 18, 2010
Dec 5, 201064 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 47
  • February 32
  • March 44
  • April 48
  • May 40
  • June 33
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 35
  • February 27
  • March 39
  • April 24
  • May 26
  • June 18
  • July 43
  • August 20
  • September 39
  • October 48
  • November 34
  • December 24
2010 2011 2012
  • January 23
  • February 29
  • March 33
  • April 35
  • May 30
  • June 27
  • July 34
  • August 61
  • September 32
  • October 27
  • November 27
  • December 17
2009 2010 2011
  • January 31
  • February 45
  • March 46
  • April 46
  • May 27
  • June 29
  • July 22
  • August 15
  • September 13
  • October 22
  • November 8
  • December 7
2009 2010
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April 70
  • May 43
  • June 80
  • July 36
  • August 17
  • September 35
  • October 32
  • November 51
  • December 56